Tuesday, 11 February 2014

Does a protagonist who has flaws distract readers from the narrative itself?

Er, it's called a character arc, people!

But seriously, does it?

Off the top of my head, I've written stories about a detective who has hallucinations and may or may not be Jack the goddamn Ripper; a teenage love-triangle with homosexual tendencies; and poems about soldiers leaving behind loved ones, and a number of other delusional things. Is there a part of me in some of these? Of course. But hey, everyone loves an underdog! I would hope that they build character and make them more interesting for the audience (whomever may read it), rather than make them less lovable and life-like. Life is supposed to be about the good and the bad, the highs and the lows which form our outlook on situations. Either this or you’re taking away their very core of being remotely realistic.

People need role models; people need the truth. I wouldn't be where I am now without my downfalls, flaws and all. Cheever for example, makes ‘a lot’ of references to alcohol, no matter how subtle or obvious (take your pick). His alcoholism in his personal life, however, does not have a direct effect on his work. Taking ‘Swimmer’ as an example, it may have the underlining of his alcohol usage, but it doesn't stop it from becoming a well-known and well written story.

Actually, come to think of it, Emily Dickinson’s ‘Over the Fence’ doesn't make me love the protagonist any less just because she’s curious about her womanhood.

Protagonist definition via http://dictionary.reference.com
   










No comments:

Post a Comment